![]() ![]() Consider, for instance, the omnipresence of robots in artistic conceptions of the future, stretching from Fritz Lang’s expressionist masterpiece “Metropolis” to Isaac Asimov’s lengthy bibliography to the “Blade Runner” series. The genre of science fiction has been innately political from its inception. It requires a degree of honesty and clarity in one’s political intentions which can often be off-putting, but feels right at home in the field of speculative fiction. The utopia is, first and foremost, a political tool. What is so fascinating about utopian fiction is its potential power to shape the kind of society we want to live in and progress toward. If we don’t believe in the possibility of a better future, what else do we really have? To some extent, imagining a future of failure, suffering and apocalypse is simply a reflection of our society’s existential dread, first driven by the threat of nuclear war and now climate change.īut the fact that so much of our cultural output seems so pessimistic about our future has the potential to actually cement a nihilistic attitude of the future and an antipathy toward the present.īelieving that we have no hope to ever change the course of our future plays directly into the hands of those most responsible for the rising carbon emissions that threaten our existence or the massive military-industrial complex that benefits so much from designing deadly weapons and the auxiliary systems needed to deploy them. The famous choice Laurence Fishburne’s Morpheus offers between the “blue pill” and the “red pill” has been appropriated by online reactionaries, even when the color of the red pill is specifically a reference to the color of estrogen pills. Or consider the cultural stranglehold that “The Matrix,” a sci-fi allegory for the transgender experience created by two trans siblings, has on both our conception of virtual reality and our politics. ![]() We have used “1984” so much to signify something authoritarian or totalitarian that it has almost completely lost all meaning, which is fitting considering the point of Orwell’s novel. Our pop culture is dominated by dystopias.įrom “The Hunger Games,” set to release a prequel film in November, to the TV show “The Last of Us,” to James Cameron’s “Avatar” franchise, our cultural conception of humanity’s future seems overwhelmingly bleak.īeyond the recent examples, of course, are the lengthy list of dystopian films which have transformed our society and politics forever. However, beyond these rare examples, most science fiction properties today tend not to embrace utopian visions of the future. The actual best example is probably “Star Trek,” which showcases a pretty progressive view of a moneyless global human community under a single government that has established a mostly peaceful federation of planets by the 22nd century. Ultimately, however, this ideal 2015 disappears when his father’s high school bully steals a future sports almanac to become a massively powerful Donald Trump-inspired casino mogul in the 1980s, then making preparations for a presidential run. Maybe there’s the idealized version of 2015 in “Back to the Future Part II” that Marty McFly visits, complete with hoverboards and a 19th movie in the “Jaws” franchise. When was the last time you saw a piece of science fiction depict a future you actually wanted to live in? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |